Author: inhouseinclusive

Focus: This is where the “Archiving Web Content” information comes in, highlighting the relief this exception offers.

Key Takeaways:

• The Problem: Acknowledge the challenge of legacy content for state and local governments.
• The Solution: Introduce the DOJ’s specific exception for archived web content.
• The Four Conditions: Clearly outline the four conditions for content to qualify as “archived” (created before compliance date, reference only, clearly marked, unmodified).
• Initial Relief: Emphasize that not everything needs to be remediated, offering a sense of hope and clarity.

Focus: A slightly more technical (but still high-level) look at what WCAG 2.1 AA actually requires, without diving into every single success criterion.

Key Takeaways:

• The Four Principles (POUR): Explain Perceivable, Operable, Understandable, Robust in simple terms.
• Examples: Give concrete, easy-to-understand examples of what WCAG 2.1 AA means in practice (e.g., alt text for images, keyboard navigation, clear headings, sufficient color contrast).
• Beyond the Basics: Briefly touch on new additions in 2.1 over 2.0, such as mobile accessibility and touch targets, if relevant to your audience.
• Starting Point: Suggest an accessibility audit or review as a first step.

Focus: An introductory post announcing the new DOJ rules, why they matter, and the core message of WCAG 2.1 compliance.

Key Takeaways:

Call to Action: Encourage readers to understand what WCAG 2.1 AA entails.

Big Picture: The DOJ has updated its regulations under the ADA, making WCAG 2.1 AA the new standard for state and local government websites.

Why It Matters: This isn’t just about compliance; it’s about making government services truly accessible to everyone, including people with disabilities.

Key Date: Mention the general compliance dates (e.g., small vs. large entities) without getting into extreme detail, just to set expectations.